Federal contractor · MESA, AZ

THE BOEING COMPANY

THE BOEING COMPANY received $2.5B in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 25 awards (+409% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $14.5B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2.4B).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.5B
New awards
25
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LAJJQWA1PF31
Parent company
THE BOEING COMPANY
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the THE BOEING COMPANY company family: 99 registered entities, $27.2B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. THE BOEING COMPANYSAINT LOUIS, MO · Family page
    $6.1B
  2. THE BOEING COMPANYTUKWILA, WA
    $9B
  3. THE BOEING COMPANYRIDLEY PARK, PA
    $2.3B
  4. THE BOEING COMPANYLONG BEACH, CA
    $1.8B
  5. THE BOEING COMPANYSAINT LOUIS, MO
    $1.3B

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.3BFY2017
  2. 1.6BFY2018
  3. 1.6BFY2019
  4. 1.8BFY2020
  5. 935.3MFY2021
  6. 337.7MFY2022
  7. 2.5BFY2023
  8. 628.1MFY2024
  9. 481.3MFY2025
  10. 2.5BFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$2.4B97%
    17 awards
  2. Defense Contract Management Agency$76.5M3.1%
    2 awards
  3. U.S. Special Operations Command$3.2M0.1%
    4 awards
  4. Defense Logistics Agency$00.0%
    1 awards
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration-$0.140.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$2.4B97%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$43.2M1.8%
  3. Research & development$28.4M1.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. Maricopa County, AZ$2.5B100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $2.5B
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $2.5B
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$2.4B
    Department of Defense · 2 awards
  2. U.S. Special Operations Command$3.2M
    Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. W58RGZ-16-C-0023 IS FOR THE AWARD OF ADVANCE PROCUREMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $184,930,000.00 TO SUPPORT LOT 7 FULL RATE PRODUCTION LONG LEAD ITEMS.$4.3B
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Maricopa County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 18, 2016 – Jun 4, 2026· W58RGZ16C0023
  2. APACHE NEW BUILD ATTACK HELICOPTERS (AH)-64E FOR FOREIGN MILITARY SALE CUSTOMERS POLAND (QTY OF 96), EGYPT (QTY OF 2) AND KUWAIT (QTY OF 8). THIS INCLUDES ASSOCIATED COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES AND LONGBOW CREW TRAINERS (LCTS)$2.3B
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 25, 2025 – May 18, 2026· W58RGZ26C0002
  3. APACHE ADVANCED PROCUREMENT AWARD FOR LOT 12 FULL RATE PRODUCTION.$1.5B
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 18, 2021 – Jun 1, 2026· W58RGZ21C0015
  4. AWARD OF THE VERSION 6X CONFIGURATION TASK ORDER.$191.7M
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 28, 2021 – Apr 28, 2026· W58RGZ22F0140
  5. UNDEFINITIZED CONTRACT ACTION FOR NON-RECURRING ENGINEERING AND LONG LEAD ITEMS IN SUPPORT OF THE STATEMENT OF WORK FOR EIGHT AH-6 AIRCRAFT FOR THE ROYAL THAILAND ARMY.$136.8M
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 25, 2020 – Apr 23, 2026· W58RGZ20C0037
  6. IMPROVED TAIL ROTOR BLADE (AH-64) PRE-QUALIFICATION ACTIVITIES$70.5M
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Research & development· Sep 29, 2022 – May 6, 2026· W911W622F704E
  7. UCA TASK ORDER FOR OIL COOLED GENERATORS$62.8M
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 28, 2023 – Apr 17, 2026· W58RGZ23F0347
  8. TASK ORDER AWARD FOR APACHE AH-64E JAGM SOFTWARE INTEGRATION.$26.5M
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Feb 28, 2017 – Dec 11, 2025· 0017

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

THE BOEING COMPANY received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$759.4K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 759.4KFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 0FY2023
  4. 0FY2024
  5. 0FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $287M (427 subawards)

145 sub-recipients

  1. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$29.7M10%
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 1 subaward
  2. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.$27.7M9.6%
    PHOENIX, AZ · 2 subawards
  3. PCX AEROSTRUCTURES, LLC$23.6M8.2%
    NEWINGTON, CT · 16 subawards
  4. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.$19.3M6.7%
    TEMPE, AZ · 7 subawards
  5. SCI TECHNOLOGY, INC$17.6M6.1%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  6. PCX AEROSYSTEMS-MANCHESTER, LLC$12.9M4.5%
    MANCHESTER, CT · 12 subawards
  7. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC$8.4M2.9%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  8. COX & COMPANY, INC.$7.5M2.6%
    PLAINVIEW, NY · 2 subawards
  9. ITT CANNON LLC$7.5M2.6%
    IRVINE, CA · 6 subawards
  10. HEXCEL POTTSVILLE CORP$5.9M2.1%
    ST CLAIR, PA · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $177.4K (4 subawards)

2 primes

  1. S & K FEDERAL SERVICES LLC$130K73%
    SAINT IGNATIUS, MT · 3 subawards
  2. S&K LOGISTICS SERVICES, LLC$47.3K27%
    BYRON, GA · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 12% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $356.8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $460.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $519.9M paid out · $174.8K received
  • FY2024: $660.8M paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2025: $349.1M paid out · $770.9K received
  • FY2026: $287M paid out · $177.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2,364 companies · $39.4B reported

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$4.8B
    TUCSON, AZ · 2,203 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$2.6B
    YORK, PA · 796 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$2B
    MELBOURNE, FL · 697 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

94 companies · $8.9B reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$7.5B
    FORT WORTH, TX · 809 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$580.6M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 205 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BELL TEXTRON INC$101.1M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 47 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 167 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$84.4B−24% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 227 entities · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+10 more
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$171.9B−38% in FY2026
    FORT WORTH, TX · 128 entities · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+7 more
  3. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$41.6B−14% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+12 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of THE BOEING COMPANY (99 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Jeppesen ForeFlightAI match · 100%
  • SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS, INC.AI match · 100%
  • THE BOEING COMPANYAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$11.3M
52 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$42.9M
$42.9M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$1.4M
2 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$14.4M
    71 reports
  2. 2024$11.9M
    65 reports
  3. 2025$11.3M
    52 reports
  4. 2026$5.2M
    29 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense110 reports
  2. Aviation, aircraft and airlines104 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations60 reports
  4. Aerospace53 reports
  5. Health issues39 reports
  6. Trade (domestic and foreign)39 reports
  7. Environment and Superfund28 reports
  8. Foreign relations21 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES201 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE198 reports
  3. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)22 reports
  4. Navy - Dept of21 reports
  5. Air Force - Dept of19 reports
  6. Army - Dept of (Other)18 reports
  7. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)18 reports
  8. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)16 reports
  9. U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)16 reports
  10. White House Office16 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Crossroads Strategies, LLC$1.3M
    14 reports
  2. S-3 Group$960K
    14 reports
  3. Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$880K
    15 reports
  4. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$770K
    10 reports
  5. The Lugar Group (FKA Lugar Hellmann Group)$650K
    13 reports
  6. Empire Consulting Group$630K
    14 reports
  7. Avoq, LLC$560K
    7 reports
  8. Squire Patton Boggs$490K
    11 reports

22 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$844.5K62%
  2. Democratic$512.5K37%
  3. Other or none$11.5K0.8%

PACs sponsored

  • THE BOEING COMPANY PAC$3.9M raised this cycle
  • SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS, INC. PAC$44.6K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.