Federal contractor · SALT LAKE CITY, UT

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH received $960.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+43% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($916.7K). It also received $6.6M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$960.2K
New awards
7
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
C2FPQ758BZ61
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the UNIVERSITY OF UTAH company family: 3 registered entities, $22.3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. UNIVERSITY OF UTAHSALT LAKE CITY, UT · Family page
    $21.3M
  2. UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, THESALT LAKE CITY, UT
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 609.7KFY2017
  2. 432.2KFY2018
  3. 448.1KFY2019
  4. 517.1KFY2020
  5. 464.4KFY2021
  6. 432.8KFY2022
  7. 398.7KFY2023
  8. 429.5KFY2024
  9. 669.8KFY2025
  10. 960.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$916.7K86%
  2. Professional services$102.8K9.7%
  3. IT & telecom$40.7K3.8%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $960.2K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $960.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Salt Lake County, UT· Education & social services· Sep 25, 2025 – Feb 13, 2026· N3560A25FB249
  2. Department of the Navy· Salt Lake County, UT· Education & social services· Feb 20, 2026 – Feb 20, 2026· N3560A26FB108
  3. National Institutes of Health· Salt Lake County, UT· Professional services· Mar 5, 2025 – Dec 9, 2025· 75N98025P00570
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Salt Lake County, UT· IT & telecom· Jul 16, 2024 – Mar 2, 2026· 36C10B24C0030
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Salt Lake County, UT· Professional services· Apr 18, 2024 – Jan 20, 2026· 36C24E24N0106
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Salt Lake County, UT· Research & development· Sep 11, 2024 – Sep 29, 2026· 36C25924P1337
  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Salt Lake County, UT· Research & development· Sep 26, 2025 – May 1, 2026· 80LARC25C0002

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH received $6.6M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 449 actions (256 new awards). Its largest program was 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries ($6.6M).

Assistance · FY2026
$6.6M
New awards
256
Actions
449
Since FY2024
$6.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. -172.7KFY2024
  2. 6.6MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$6.6M100%

Top programs

  1. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries$6.6M100%

Awarding agencies

Largest awards

  1. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Feb 28, 2026 – Jun 15, 2026· SL-2499017641
  2. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Feb 28, 2026 – Feb 28, 2026· SL-2399005634
  3. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Feb 28, 2026 – Feb 28, 2026· SL-2499021384
  4. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Dec 31, 2024 – Feb 28, 2026· SL-2399009967
  5. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Feb 28, 2026 – Jun 15, 2026· SL-2499016797
  6. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Feb 28, 2026 – Feb 28, 2026· SL-2499017113

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $4.7M (10 subawards)

6 primes

  1. BURLINGTON, VT · 1 subaward
  2. DAVIS, CA · 2 subawards
  3. EMORY UNIVERSITY$306.1K6.5%
    ATLANTA, GA · 4 subawards
  4. PITTSBURGH, PA · 1 subaward
  5. EVANSTON, IL · 1 subaward
  6. BLOOMINGTON, IN · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $6.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $5.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.6M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $4.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

310 companies · $253.7M reported

  1. BOSTON, MA · 5 subawards
  2. NORTH LOGAN, UT · 32 subawards
  3. TACOMA, WA · 11 subawards

Primes that pay it

239 companies · $342.6M reported

  1. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE STATE OF UTAH$19.3M
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 1 subaward
  2. CAMBRIDGE, MA · 9 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. LAUREL, MD · 26 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 28 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 2 entities · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development servicesVeterans Affairs · Colleges, universities, and professional schoolsVeterans Affairs · Scientific research and development services
  2. CAMDEN, NJ · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development services
  3. NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$31M−0.1% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of UNIVERSITY OF UTAH (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • University of UtahAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$300K
7 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$820K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$210K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$210K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$300K
    7 reports
  4. 2026$100K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations16 reports
  2. Health issues16 reports
  3. Education14 reports
  4. Medicare and Medicaid14 reports
  5. Science and technology14 reports
  6. Real estate, land use and conservation6 reports
  7. Defense2 reports
  8. Transportation2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES13 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE9 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Van Scoyoc Associates$720K
    14 reports
  2. McAllister & Quinn, LLC$100K
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.