Federal contractor · SEATTLE, WA

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON received $149.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−39% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $1.2M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($149.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$149.3K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
ENRDZK5WDN43
Parent company
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON INC
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON company family: 14 registered entities, $55.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONSEATTLE, WA · Family page
    $52.8M
  2. $2.3M
  3. $255.1K
  4. $54.9K
  5. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 188.6KFY2021
  2. 376.5KFY2023
  3. 250.7KFY2024
  4. 245.7KFY2025
  5. 149.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$149.3K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $149.3K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $149.3K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Prince George's County, MD· Education & social services· Jul 27, 2026 – Jul 27, 2026· 80NSSC26P1070

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $398.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $792.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

689 companies · $1B reported

  1. ZIM - TTECH$67.2M
    HARARE, ZW · 17 subawards
  2. SEATTLE, WA · 294 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. SEATTLE, WA · 229 subawards

Primes that pay it

325 companies · $2.3B reported

  1. PITTSBURGH, PA · 27 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. MILITARY DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON STA$375.6M
    CAMP MURRAY, WA · 37 subawards
  3. SEATTLE, WA · 234 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 38 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CASTELION CORPORATION$257.1M+201% in FY2026
    TORRANCE, CA · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. ASSURANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP$247.6M−73% in FY2026
    CARLISLE, MA · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$416.3M−35% in FY2026
    AUSTIN, TX · 15 entities · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development services+3 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON (14 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • University of WashingtonAI match · 100%
  • University of Washington MedicineAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.3M
15 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.7M
$3.7M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$820K
    12 reports
  2. 2024$880K
    12 reports
  3. 2025$1.3M
    15 reports
  4. 2026$630K
    9 reports

Top issues

  1. Education33 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations28 reports
  3. Defense14 reports
  4. Environment and Superfund14 reports
  5. Health issues14 reports
  6. Immigration14 reports
  7. Science and technology14 reports
  8. Labor issues, antitrust and workplace12 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES29 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE29 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. WASHINGTON2 ADVOCATES$420K
    14 reports
  2. BALLARD PARTNERS$420K
    5 reports
  3. McDermott+ LLC$0
    15 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.