Federal contractor · CLACKAMAS, OR

VIGOR WORKS LLC

VIGOR WORKS LLC received $74.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (−1.7% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $730.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($74.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$74.9M
New awards
14
Sole-source
14%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NJ2RRT5BMCX1
Parent company
VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the VIGOR MARINE LLC company family: 4 registered entities, $769.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. VIGOR MARINE LLCPORTLAND, OR · Family page
    $694.2M
  2. $0
  3. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 56.1MFY2017
  2. 53.5MFY2018
  3. 54.9MFY2019
  4. 83.3MFY2020
  5. 50MFY2021
  6. 16.9MFY2022
  7. 140.9MFY2023
  8. 123.8MFY2024
  9. 76.2MFY2025
  10. 74.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 13 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$64.1M86%
  2. Equipment maintenance$10.8M14%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition14%
    US 39% · $10.8M
  • Sole-source awards14%
    US 30% · $10.8M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 5 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Clackamas County, OR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 16, 2021 – Jun 12, 2026· W56HZV21F0381
  2. Department of the Navy· Clackamas County, OR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 26, 2020 – May 28, 2026· H9240520F0022
  3. Department of the Army· Clackamas County, OR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 29, 2023 – Jun 9, 2026· W56HZV23F0479
  4. LRIP 3$61.6M
    Department of the Army· Clackamas County, OR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 25, 2024 – Jun 9, 2026· W912CH24F0171
  5. LRIP 4$60.7M
    Department of the Army· Clackamas County, OR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 25, 2024 – Jun 9, 2026· W912CH24F0172
  6. Department of the Army· Clackamas County, OR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 28, 2024 – Jun 9, 2026· W912CH25F0041
  7. Department of the Army· Clark County, WA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 18, 2026 – May 18, 2026· W912CH26F0130
  8. Department of the Army· Clark County, WA· Equipment maintenance· Apr 28, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026· W912CH26F0131

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $36.8M (135 subawards)

60 sub-recipients

  1. NEW ORLEANS, LA · 2 subawards
  2. ASHTABULA, OH · 8 subawards
  3. VANCOUVER, WA · 9 subawards
  4. EBDG, INC.$3.1M8.3%
    SEATTLE, WA · 5 subawards
  5. NORTH BILLERICA, MA · 5 subawards
  6. SPRING, TX · 3 subawards
  7. CHESAPEAKE, VA · 7 subawards
  8. PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING INC$1.3M3.5%
    LENEXA, KS · 1 subaward
  9. BLACKLICK, OH · 1 subaward
  10. ARLINGTON, VA · 12 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $6.1M (3 subawards)

2 primes

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 subawards
  2. LEXINGTON, KY · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 49% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $142.4K paid out · $7.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $7.8M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $16.7M received
  • FY2024: $6.4M paid out · $7.7M received
  • FY2025: $42.3M paid out · $11.5M received
  • FY2026: $36.8M paid out · $6.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

418 companies · $698.9M reported

  1. HERNDON, VA · 65 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. ALPHARETTA, GA · 53 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. EVERETT, WA · 42 subawards · Ship and boat building

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $57.7M reported

  1. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 30 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 17 subawards · Other support services
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BLUEFORGE ALLIANCE$1.3B+21% in FY2026
    BRYAN, TX · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat building
  2. AUSTAL USA, LLC$2.5B−55% in FY2026
    MOBILE, AL · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat buildingU.S. Coast Guard · Ship and boat building
  3. PASCAGOULA, MS · 2 entities · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.