Federal department or agency

National Endowment for the Humanities

National Endowment for the Humanities obligated $2.1M on federal contracts in FY2026 across 55 contract actions (+6.9% vs FY2025). Its largest recipient was MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC ($511.3K). It also awarded $159.1M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$2.1M
Actions
55
New awards: 27
Sole-source
35%
Small business
63%

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.7MFY2017
  2. 2.1MFY2018
  3. 2.5MFY2019
  4. 2.3MFY2020
  5. 2.3MFY2021
  6. 3.6MFY2022
  7. 657.2KFY2023
  8. 1.7MFY2024
  9. 1.9MFY2025
  10. 2.1MFY2026

Sub-agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Top recipients

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. BAHFED CORP$172.3K8.3%
  2. PARAMIFY, INC$95.5K4.6%

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$1.1M51%
  2. Professional services$639.4K30%
  3. Transportation & logistics$165.1K7.7%
  4. Construction & real property$113K5.3%
  5. Education & social services$106.2K5.0%
  6. Equipment maintenance$17.4K0.8%

Where the work was performed

  1. North Carolina$216.1K10%
  2. Oregon$172.3K8.3%
  3. Utah$95.5K4.6%
  4. Virginia$20K1.0%
  5. New York$15.3K0.7%
  6. Maryland$13.8K0.7%
  7. Georgia$6,0000.3%
  8. Michigan$5,9980.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition65%
    US 39% · $1.4M
  • Sole-source awards35%
    US 30% · $720.1K
  • Single-offer competitions31%
    US 8.7% · $635.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0
  • Year-end rush38%
    US 6.0% · $792.6K
  • Undefinitized contracts0.0%
    US 5.0% · $0
  • Time-and-materials pricing7.2%
    US 4.2% · $150.3K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Offices with the most sole-source money

  1. National Endowment for the Humanities

Largest awards

  1. MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 28, 2025 – Sep 1, 2026· 43310125P00080
  2. WILLIAMS, ADLEY & COMPANY DC LLP· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jul 16, 2025 – May 5, 2026· 43310125F00015
  3. SHAW, BRANSFORD, & ROTH P.C.· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 23, 2026 – Jun 25, 2026· 43310126F00004
  4. BAHFED CORP· Multnomah County, OR· Professional services· Feb 1, 2026 – Feb 1, 2026· 43310126F00005
  5. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY· District of Columbia, DC· Transportation & logistics· Sep 23, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 43310126P00042
  6. N2GRATE GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC· Wake County, NC· IT & telecom· Mar 6, 2026 – Mar 6, 2026· 43310126P00017
  7. REDHAWK IT SOLUTIONS, LLC· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 19, 2025 – Aug 20, 2026· 43310125P00084
  8. KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 25, 2025 – May 8, 2026· 43310125F00008

Federal grants & assistance awarded

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

National Endowment for the Humanities obligated $159.1M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1,430 actions (371 new awards), +124% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 45.129 · Promotion of the Humanities Federal/State Partnership ($44M).

Assistance · FY2026
$159.1M
New awards
371
Actions
1,430
Since FY2021
$966.9M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 211.9MFY2021
  2. 193.2MFY2022
  3. 167.1MFY2023
  4. 164.6MFY2024
  5. 71MFY2025
  6. 159.1MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$159.1M100%

Top programs

  1. 45.129 · Promotion of the Humanities Federal/State Partnership$44M28%
  2. 45.164 · Promotion of the Humanities Public Programs$41.8M26%
  3. 45.161 · Promotion of the Humanities Research$36.5M23%
  4. 45.130 · Promotion of the Humanities Challenge Grants$17.9M11%
  5. 45.149 · Promotion of the Humanities Division of Preservation and Access$13.9M8.7%
  6. 45.163 · Promotion of the Humanities Professional Development$2.6M1.7%
  7. 45.160 · Promotion of the Humanities Fellowships and Stipends$2.3M1.5%
  8. 45.035 · National Endowment for the Humanities: Collaborative Research$613.9K0.4%

Top recipients (organizations)

  1. TIKVAH FUND$10.4M6.6%
    NEW YORK, NY
  2. CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
  3. CHAPEL HILL, NC
  4. AUSTIN, TX
  5. WEST POINT, NY
  6. COLUMBUS, OH
  7. BOSTON, MA
  8. FREDERICKSBURG, VA

Where it went

  1. New York$25.4M16%
  2. Virginia$16.3M10%
  3. Texas$12.9M8.1%
  4. North Carolina$12.9M8.1%
  5. Massachusetts$7.8M4.9%
  6. Ohio$7.7M4.8%
  7. Tennessee$6.8M4.3%
  8. California$5.9M3.7%
  9. Illinois$4.1M2.6%

By state of the place of performance.

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Federal grants & assistance

Subawards under this agency's awards

First-tier subawards that recipients of this agency's contracts and financial assistance reported, by the fiscal year of the subaward.

FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $1.1M (15 subawards)

15 sub-recipients

Largest sub-recipients

  1. AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY$232.9K22%
    PHILADELPHIA, PA · 1 subaward
  2. MONTPELIER STATION, VA · 1 subaward
  3. COLUMBIA, SC · 1 subaward
  4. CHAPEL HILL, NC · 1 subaward
  5. WORCESTER, MA · 1 subaward
  6. COLLEGE STATION, TX · 1 subaward
  7. IOWA CITY, IA · 1 subaward
  8. THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK$48.8K4.6%
    OSWEGO, NY · 1 subaward
  9. WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward
  10. DEPAUL UNIVERSITY$40.3K3.8%
    CHICAGO, IL · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Who lobbies this agency

Organizations whose quarterly lobbying reports list this agency as contacted, ranked by the reports' spending. A report's amount covers all its issues and every agency it lists; reports do not split it.

Lobbying in 2026
$290.9K
Clients
5
Reports
10

The whole amount of every report that lists this agency.

Organizations lobbying it, 2026

  1. American Association of Museums$115.9K
    Not matched to a contract recipient · Budget and appropriations, Education, Arts and entertainment
  2. National Humanities Alliance$95K
    Not matched to a contract recipient · Budget and appropriations, Education
  3. City of Beaverton$40K
    Not matched to a contract recipient · Budget and appropriations, Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code, Transportation

2 more clients ($40K) are counted but not named: their names may be a person's.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated —.

Committees that oversee and fund it

Congressional committees whose jurisdiction includes this agency, and the appropriations subcommittees that write its spending bill (Analisa's reading of the House and Senate rules; committees share jurisdiction). Leaders as currently published.

…

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.