Federal contractor · LITTLETON, CO

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP received $2.2B in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 39 awards (−30% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $24.1B. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.1B).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.2B
New awards
39
Sole-source
55%
Single offer
27%
UEI
FYHNA5WC8XD7
Parent company
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION company family: 128 registered entities, $46.1B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONFORT WORTH, TX · Family page
    $13B
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONGRAND PRAIRIE, TX
    $13.3B
  3. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATIONSTRATFORD, CT
    $2.9B
  4. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONORLANDO, FL
    $2.7B
  5. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONMOORESTOWN, NJ
    $2.5B

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.6BFY2017
  2. 1.3BFY2018
  3. 1.8BFY2019
  4. 2.1BFY2020
  5. 2.7BFY2021
  6. 3.5BFY2022
  7. 3.3BFY2023
  8. 2.5BFY2024
  9. 3.1BFY2025
  10. 2.2BFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$1.1B49%
    17 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$718.5M33%
    2 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$400M18%
    15 awards
  4. Defense Contract Management Agency-$42.7K0.0%
    4 awards
  5. Department of Energy-$2.7M0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$1.1B51%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$602M28%
  3. Professional services$471.1M22%

Where the work was performed

  1. Douglas County, CO$2.2B99.6%
  2. Bucks County, PA$10.6M0.5%
  3. Jefferson County, CO$243.4K0.0%
  4. Los Angeles County, CA$100K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition82%
    US 39% · $1.8B
  • Sole-source awards55%
    US 30% · $1.2B
  • Single-offer competitions27%
    US 8.8% · $589M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$469.6M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES BY LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION AS THE NEW CONTRACTING PARTY IN AND TO THE CONTRACT DE-AC04-94AL85000$48.1B
    Department of Energy· Bernalillo County, NM· Facilities & utilities· Oct 19, 2016 – Jul 7, 2026· DEAC0494AL85000
  2. DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, TEST&EVALUATION OF PROJECT ORION$15.6B
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Douglas County, CO· Research & development· Oct 3, 2016 – Sep 29, 2026· NNJ06TA25C
  3. IR CPS WS DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION$4B
    Department of the Navy· Douglas County, CO· Research & development· Dec 20, 2018 – Jun 5, 2026· N0003019C0025
  4. GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS III FOLLOW-ON$3B
    Department of the Air Force· Douglas County, CO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 26, 2018 – Jun 12, 2026· FA880718C0009
  5. THE GOVERNMENT IS PROCURING THE NEXT-GENERATION GEOSTATIONARY OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITES (GOES) SERIES TO CONTINUE ITS MISSION THROUGH NEW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE GOES-R LEVEL I REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT AND MISSION REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT (MRD). THE FIRST SATELLITE OF THIS NEW SERIES, DESIGNATED AS GOES-R, WILL PROVIDE THE FIRST MAJOR IMPROVEMENT IN INSTRUMENT TECHNOLOGY SINCE GOES-I LAUNCHED IN 1994. THE GOES-R SERIES WILL INTRODUCE OTHER NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN BOTH THE SPACE AND GROUND SEGMENTS. THESE ADVANCES WILL IMPROVE THE NATION'S ABILITY TO MONITOR AND FORECAST WEATHER AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHENOMENA WITH A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF PRODUCTS. ONE OF NOAA'S PRINCIPAL MISSIONS IS TO PROVIDE FORECASTS AND WARNINGS FOR THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES, ADJACENT WATERS AND OCEAN AREA FOR THE PROTECTION OF LIFE AND PROPERTY AND ENHANCEMENT OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY. THIS MISSION REQUIRES THE CAPABILITY TO ACQUIRE, PROCESS, AND DISSEMINATE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA ON AN EXTENSIVE SPATIAL RANGE (GLOBAL, REGIONAL AND LOCAL) ON A VARIETY OF TIME SCALES. THESE DATA INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: GLOBAL IMAGERY; CLOUD AND PRECIPITATION PARAMETERS; ATMOSPHERIC PROFILES OF TEMPERATURE, MOISTURE, WINDS, AEROSOLS, AND OZONE; SURFACE CONDITIONS CONCERNING ICE, SNOW AND VEGETATION; OCEAN PARAMETERS AND SEA-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; AND SOLAR AND IN-SITU SPACE ENVIRONMENT CONDITIONS. THE STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) DEFINES THOSE TASKS TO DESIGN, ANALYZE, VALIDATE, DEVELOP, FABRICATE, ASSEMBLE, INTEGRATE, TEST, VERIFY, EVALUATE, DELIVER GOES-R SERIES SATELLITES AND SUPPORT LAUNCH AND POST LAUNCH, SUPPLY AND MAINTAIN THE GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (GSE), AND SUPPORT THE NOAA SATELLITE OPERATIONS CONTROL CENTER (SOCC). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE PERSONNEL, MATERIALS, FACILITIES, AND OTHER RESOURCES TO DESIGN, VALIDATE, FABRICATE, ASSEMBLE, INTEGRATE, TEST, VERIFY, AND DELIVER GOES-R SERIES SATELLITES AND PROVIDE PRE-LAUNCH, LAUNCH, AND POST-LAUNCH SUPPORT AND TRAINING UNDER THE BASIC CONTRACT, AND OPTIONS WHEN EXERCISED BY THE GOVERNMENT.$2.1B
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Douglas County, CO· Research & development· Oct 17, 2016 – Jul 27, 2026· NNG09HR00C
  6. SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT. PRODUCT SUPPORT INTEGRATION, CONTRACT EVOLUTION$1.5B
    Department of the Air Force· Douglas County, CO· Professional services· Jun 4, 2021 – May 18, 2026· FA882321C0001
  7. COMBINED ORBITAL OPERATIONS, LOGISTICS, AND RESILIENCY CORE SUSTAINMENT.$656.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Douglas County, CO· Professional services· May 28, 2021 – May 8, 2026· FA882321F2006
  8. ORIGINS SPECTRAL INTERPRETATION RESOURCE IDENTIFICATION SECURITY-REGOLITH EXPLORER (OSIRIS-REX) PHASE B EFFORT. UNDER THIS CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE RESOURCES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE MISSION DESIGN AND REQUIREMENTS FLOW DOWN ACTIVITIES CULMINATING IN AN OSIRIS-REX PROJECT MISSION DESIGN REVIEW (MDR). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE RESOURCES NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE OSIRIS-REX PROJECT TO DEFINE AND COMPLETE THE DEFINITION OF THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN, AND THE PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT, MANUFACTURE, TEST, VERIFICATION AND OPERATION OF A FLIGHT SYSTEM.$443.3M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Douglas County, CO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 20, 2016 – Jun 25, 2026· NNG12FD66C

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $13.2M (5 subawards)

5 sub-recipients

  1. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.$11.3M86%
    GLENDALE, AZ · 1 subaward
  2. MOOG INC$985K7.4%
    EAST AURORA, NY · 1 subaward
  3. FUTURE ELECTRONICS CORP$790.7K6.0%
    BOLTON, MA · 1 subaward
  4. SPIRIT AMERICA CORP$101.3K0.8%
    PHOENIX, AZ · 1 subaward
  5. ALL TECH ELECTRONICS INC$34.5K0.3%
    HAWTHORNE, NY · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $7.1M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC, THE$7.1M100%
    LAUREL, MD · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.6% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $14.2B paid out · $36.8M received
  • FY2022: $914.7M paid out · $34.2M received
  • FY2023: $1.6B paid out · $81.7M received
  • FY2024: $1.1B paid out · $18.2M received
  • FY2025: $533.2M paid out · $3.7M received
  • FY2026: $13.2M paid out · $7.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

4,982 companies · $247.8B reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$43B
    MELBOURNE, FL · 6,189 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. MARINETTE MARINE CORPORATION$32.3B
    MARINETTE, WI · 304 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$20.2B
    TUCSON, AZ · 6,713 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

114 companies · $3.1B reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$763.9M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 318 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. BELL TEXTRON INC$636.9M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 25 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$426.1M
    TUCSON, AZ · 16 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 143 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$84.4B−24% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 227 entities · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+13 more
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$74.6B+20% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 99 entities · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+7 more
  3. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$41.6B−14% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services+15 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION (128 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • LifePortAI match · 97%
Lobbying · 2025
$15.6M
59 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$50.2M
$50.2M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$1.2M
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$13.9M
    60 reports
  2. 2024$12.4M
    47 reports
  3. 2025$15.6M
    59 reports
  4. 2026$8.3M
    30 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense180 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations81 reports
  3. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code59 reports
  4. Aerospace17 reports
  5. Intelligence and surveillance15 reports
  6. Government issues14 reports
  7. Transportation14 reports
  8. Trade (domestic and foreign)14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE162 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES159 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)28 reports
  4. Navy - Dept of21 reports
  5. Executive Office of the President (EOP)15 reports
  6. Air Force - Dept of14 reports
  7. Army - Dept of (Other)14 reports
  8. Office of the Secretary of Defense14 reports
  9. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)12 reports
  10. Office of Management & Budget (OMB)12 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Penn Avenue Partners$700K
    14 reports
  2. TheGROUP DC, LLC$650K
    14 reports
  3. Capitol Counsel LLC$630K
    14 reports
  4. Etherton and Associates, Inc.$450K
    14 reports
  5. Venable LLP$430K
    14 reports
  6. Public Strategies Washington, Inc.$420K
    14 reports
  7. Ballard Spahr LLP$420K
    14 reports
  8. Michael Best Strategies LLC$380K
    5 reports

21 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$742K59%
  2. Democratic$498.5K40%
  3. Other or none$7,0000.6%

PACs sponsored

  • LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$3.5M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.