Federal contractor · BERKELEY, CA

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, THE

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, THE received $50.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 28 awards (−45% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $523.6M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($46.2M). It also received $399.8M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$50.4M
New awards
28
Sole-source
8.1%
Single offer
1.2%
UEI
GS3YEVSS12N6
Other than small businessEducational institution

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA company family: 9 registered entities, $1.4B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $1.3B
  2. $3.8M
  3. $1.8M
  4. $695.7K
  5. $327.4K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 45.7MFY2017
  2. 23.2MFY2018
  3. 22.4MFY2019
  4. 31.6MFY2020
  5. 42.9MFY2021
  6. 102.3MFY2022
  7. 71.2MFY2023
  8. 43MFY2024
  9. 90.9MFY2025
  10. 50.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 9 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 5 awards
  4. 7 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$49.6M98%
  2. Education & social services$431.7K0.9%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$241.5K0.5%
  4. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$160.9K0.3%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition9.3%
    US 39% · $4.7M
  • Sole-source awards8.1%
    US 30% · $4.1M
  • Single-offer competitions1.2%
    US 8.7% · $588.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 6 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Alameda County, CA· Research & development· Oct 14, 2016 – Jul 31, 2026· GSFC0200207DNAS502099
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Alameda County, CA· Research & development· Mar 23, 2021 – Aug 11, 2026· 80GSFC21C0059
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Alameda County, CA· Research & development· Feb 10, 2021 – Aug 13, 2026· 80GSFC21C0038
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Alameda County, CA· Research & development· Aug 21, 2019 – Jul 31, 2026· 80MSFC19C0041
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Alameda County, CA· Research & development· Jun 1, 2023 – Sep 22, 2026· 80MSFC23CA015
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Alameda County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 30, 2020 – May 7, 2026· 80GSFC20C0068
  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Alameda County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 7, 2021 – May 22, 2026· 80GSFC21C0004
  8. Defense Contract Management Agency· Alameda County, CA· Research & development· Sep 29, 2020 – Oct 31, 2025· FA875020C0156

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, THE received $399.8M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1,267 actions (222 new awards), −0.1% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program ($69.2M).

Assistance · FY2026
$399.8M
New awards
222
Actions
1,267
Since FY2021
$2.5B

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 478.4MFY2021
  2. 388.2MFY2022
  3. 381.3MFY2023
  4. 448.9MFY2024
  5. 400.1MFY2025
  6. 399.8MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$278.8M70%
  2. Direct payments$118.1M30%
  3. Other assistance$2.9M0.7%

Top programs

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$69.2M17%
  2. 93.384 · Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (Arpa-H)$43.3M11%
  3. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training$38.8M9.7%
  4. 47.049 · Mathematical and Physical Sciences$22M5.5%
  5. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research$18M4.5%
  6. 93.866 · Aging Research$16.6M4.2%
  7. 47.076 · Stem Education (Formerly Education and Human Resources)$15.7M3.9%
  8. 43.001 · Science$15.7M3.9%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Department of Defense
  3. Department of Defense
  4. Department of the Interior

Largest awards

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 26, 2024 – Dec 10, 2025· P063P240049
  2. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 20, 2025 – Sep 18, 2026· P063P250049
  3. 93.866 · Aging Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Jan 26, 2021 – Feb 13, 2026· R01AG062689
  4. 93.143 · Niehs Superfund Hazardous Substances_basic Research and Education· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Apr 12, 2021 – Dec 18, 2025· P42ES004705
  5. 93.262 · Occupational Safety and Health Program· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention· Grant· Nov 4, 2020 – Jul 31, 2026· T42OH008429
  6. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Mar 23, 2021 – Sep 17, 2026· P01AI106695

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.7M (3 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $10.4M (61 subawards)

52 sub-recipients

  1. URBANA, IL · 1 subaward
  2. YALE UNIV$1.1M9.1%
    NEW HAVEN, CT · 2 subawards
  3. STANFORD, CA · 4 subawards
  4. CHAPEL HILL, NC · 3 subawards
  5. UNIVERSIDAD DE COSTA RICA$432K3.6%
    SAN JOSE, CRI · 1 subaward
  6. MAX PLANCK FLORIDA CORP$405.3K3.3%
    JUPITER, FL · 1 subaward
  7. ALLEN INSTITUTE$373.8K3.1%
    SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward
  8. PRINCETON, NJ · 1 subaward
  9. DHAKA, BGD · 3 subawards
  10. SUSTAINABLE SCIENCES INSTITUTE$338.4K2.8%
    OAKLAND, CA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $34.9M (17 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $35.4M (161 subawards)

84 primes

  1. BOULDER, CO · 11 subawards
  2. SACRAMENTO, CA · 2 subawards
  3. LAUREL, MD · 4 subawards
  4. IOWA CITY, IA · 10 subawards
  5. ROCHESTER, NY · 3 subawards
  6. BRONX, NY · 3 subawards
  7. PHILADELPHIA, PA · 4 subawards
  8. UNIVERSITY PARK, PA · 2 subawards
  9. NEW YORK, NY · 1 subaward
  10. URBANA, IL · 5 subawards

Its reported sub-contracts equal 3.4% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $340.7M paid out · $39.6M received
  • FY2022: $68.9M paid out · $55.4M received
  • FY2023: $128.2M paid out · $104.9M received
  • FY2024: $61.6M paid out · $42.9M received
  • FY2025: $24.2M paid out · $50.8M received
  • FY2026: $12.2M paid out · $70.2M received
  • FY2027: $0 paid out · $504.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

583 companies · $997M reported

  1. WASHINGTON, DC · 12 subawards
  2. MELBOURNE, FL · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. YORK, PA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

323 companies · $771.2M reported

  1. PASADENA, CA · 76 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. BOULDER, CO · 81 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. LOS ANGELES, CA · 176 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 33 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. UCHICAGO ARGONNE, LLC$3.6B−6.1% in FY2026
    CHICAGO, IL · 3 entities · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Scientific research and development services
  2. LAKEWOOD, CO · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Scientific research and development services
  3. CHICAGO, IL · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (9 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • The Regents of the University of CaliforniaAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$700K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2026
$1.2M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$60K
    1 reports
  2. 2025$700K
    8 reports
  3. 2026$400K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Education12 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations5 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES11 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE11 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. BGR Government Affairs$740K
    6 reports
  2. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$420K
    7 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.