Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

TINKER SUPPORT SERVICES JV

No contract obligations recorded for TINKER SUPPORT SERVICES JV in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
CHX5CDJKC5G8
Parent company
CHUGACH ALASKA CORPORATION
Other than small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the WOLF CREEK FEDERAL SERVICES LLC company family: 17 registered entities, $134M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. WOLF CREEK FEDERAL SERVICES LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $3.6M
  2. $38.5M
  3. $36.9M
  4. $27.6M
  5. $25.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.3MFY2017

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for TINKER SUPPORT SERVICES JV in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

374 companies · $272.7M reported

  1. ASHBURN, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. LOUISVILLE, KY · 1 subaward · Technical and trade schools
  3. ANAHEIM, CA · 19 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $56.4M reported

  1. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 13 subawards · Other telecommunications
  2. FREMONT, OH · 16 subawards
  3. PANAMA CITY, FL · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 41 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$242.1M−58% in FY2026
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. WSM PACIFIC SIOP, A JOINT VENTURE$229.4M−92% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.